In 2018, the Competition Act was amended to introduce significant changes, including:
- Financial penalties for failing to notify a merger or prior implementation of a merger.
- A 14-day contestation period for merging parties of rejected mergers with the Competition and Consumer Authority (CCA)
- Criminal sanctions for any officer or director of an enterprise who contravenes the horizontal restrictive practice provisions of the Competition Act.
- Expansion of the general prohibition against abuse of dominance, by introducing specific conduct that amounts to abuse, including: predatory conduct, tying and bundling of products, loyalty rebates, margin squeeze, refusal to supply or deal with other enterprises (including a refusal to grant access to an essential facility.
This Act affects mergers, particularly those considered to be of “particular public interest”. Five years later and the impact of the expansion of abuse of dominance is evident in the following ongoing cases:
Competition and Consumer Authority vs Security Systems (Pty) Ltd: allegation of abuse of dominance through predatory pricing and price discrimination for alarm monitoring and response (inclusive of SMS alerts and electric fence monitoring.
Botswana Dental Association vs BOMAID and Other Medical Aid Funders: allegation of possible abuse of dominance in the form of refusal of access to an
essential facility and possible horizontal agreement through price fixing by medical aid providers. Investigation halted as BOMAID has approached the High Court of Botswana challenging the Authority’s jurisdiction.
Peo Legal provides expert counsel and representation on all aspects of competition law including mergers, horizontal and vertical restrictive practices, dominance, and the abuse of dominance.
Contact info@peolegal.co.bw for reliable counsel in your transactional matters